Difference between revisions of "1.4.3.5 Expectations from public funders"
(→Background and Expectations) |
(→Background and Expectations) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* funders willing to communicate their expectations about data management and rigor in study design, conduct, analysis, and reporting | * funders willing to communicate their expectations about data management and rigor in study design, conduct, analysis, and reporting | ||
* scientists applying for funding and willing to follow best practices in research rigor | * scientists applying for funding and willing to follow best practices in research rigor | ||
+ | |||
+ | For funders: | ||
+ | * it is expected that the tool is made freely available (e.g. as a link) on the website informing applicants about the scope of the tool | ||
+ | * the tool provides generic expectations formulated by the EQIPD working group and can be further extended by guidance and other information specific to a funding body | ||
+ | * it is expected that different funding bodies will decide as to whether: | ||
+ | ** the use of this tool is mandatory or not | ||
+ | ** whether a report generated by the tool should be made part of the application for funding | ||
+ | ** whether any additional information or evidence should be provided to support answers collected by the tool | ||
=Resources= | =Resources= |
Revision as of 09:43, 16 November 2021
Background and Expectations
EQIPD has developed a tool to support:
- funders willing to communicate their expectations about data management and rigor in study design, conduct, analysis, and reporting
- scientists applying for funding and willing to follow best practices in research rigor
For funders:
- it is expected that the tool is made freely available (e.g. as a link) on the website informing applicants about the scope of the tool
- the tool provides generic expectations formulated by the EQIPD working group and can be further extended by guidance and other information specific to a funding body
- it is expected that different funding bodies will decide as to whether:
- the use of this tool is mandatory or not
- whether a report generated by the tool should be made part of the application for funding
- whether any additional information or evidence should be provided to support answers collected by the tool
Resources
to be added
back to Toolbox
Next item: 1.5.1 Quality policy