Difference between revisions of "2.1.10 Plausibility check"
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== A. Background & Definitions == | == A. Background & Definitions == | ||
| − | There are instances when experiments are very well designed and the research team has an intention to do the study according to the design but there are often "unforeseen" situations and factors that force changes in the study | + | There are instances when experiments are very well designed and the research team has an intention to do the study according to the design but there are often "unforeseen" situations and factors that force changes in the study protocol. |
| | ||
Such "unforeseen" factors can in many cases be predicted and appropriate mitigation strategies discussed and implemented. | Such "unforeseen" factors can in many cases be predicted and appropriate mitigation strategies discussed and implemented. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Analysis of such "unforeseen" factors is the essence of the plausibility check that aims to avoid negative impact on the research rigor (e.g. not being able to enrol a required number of subjects, study becomes underpowered). | Analysis of such "unforeseen" factors is the essence of the plausibility check that aims to avoid negative impact on the research rigor (e.g. not being able to enrol a required number of subjects, study becomes underpowered). | ||
| | ||
| + | |||
== B. Guidance & Expectations == | == B. Guidance & Expectations == | ||
| − | Development of a study | + | Development of a study protocol should be concluded by a formal or informal plausibility check in order to: |
Identify obstacles for performing the experiment (e.g. sufficient amount and quality of materials and reagents; fit-for-purpose status of key hardware and software; availability of trained and properly informed colleagues to support execution of the study) | Identify obstacles for performing the experiment (e.g. sufficient amount and quality of materials and reagents; fit-for-purpose status of key hardware and software; availability of trained and properly informed colleagues to support execution of the study) | ||
Confirm that the experiment can be performed within expected timelines | Confirm that the experiment can be performed within expected timelines | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | To consider adding this subject to a training program for new employees or refresher training (if appropriate) | + | |
| − | To check whether there are feedback channels installed so that your colleagues can identify, record and report errors and critical incidents related to this subject (if appropriate) | + | '''PLEASE DO NOT FORGET''' |
| + | * To consider adding this subject to a training program for new employees or refresher training (if appropriate) | ||
| + | * To check whether there are feedback channels installed so that your colleagues can identify, record and report errors and critical incidents related to this subject (if appropriate) | ||
== C. Resources == | == C. Resources == | ||
| − | + | to be added | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 19:43, 23 March 2021
A. Background & Definitions
There are instances when experiments are very well designed and the research team has an intention to do the study according to the design but there are often "unforeseen" situations and factors that force changes in the study protocol. Such "unforeseen" factors can in many cases be predicted and appropriate mitigation strategies discussed and implemented.
Analysis of such "unforeseen" factors is the essence of the plausibility check that aims to avoid negative impact on the research rigor (e.g. not being able to enrol a required number of subjects, study becomes underpowered).
B. Guidance & Expectations
Development of a study protocol should be concluded by a formal or informal plausibility check in order to:
Identify obstacles for performing the experiment (e.g. sufficient amount and quality of materials and reagents; fit-for-purpose status of key hardware and software; availability of trained and properly informed colleagues to support execution of the study) Confirm that the experiment can be performed within expected timelines
PLEASE DO NOT FORGET
- To consider adding this subject to a training program for new employees or refresher training (if appropriate)
- To check whether there are feedback channels installed so that your colleagues can identify, record and report errors and critical incidents related to this subject (if appropriate)
C. Resources
to be added
back to Toolbox
Next item: 2.1.11 Preregistration
