Difference between revisions of "1.3.3 Promotion criteria within a research unit"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Is there a transparent description of Promotion criteria (and, if so, corresponding section of the Dossier may be used to store relevant documents or links to such documents) | * Is there a transparent description of Promotion criteria (and, if so, corresponding section of the Dossier may be used to store relevant documents or links to such documents) | ||
* Do the main criteria include adherence to Open Science and Good Research Practive principles? | * Do the main criteria include adherence to Open Science and Good Research Practive principles? | ||
+ | |||
'''PLEASE DO NOT FORGET''' | '''PLEASE DO NOT FORGET''' |
Latest revision as of 12:13, 5 September 2020
A. Background & Definitions
EQIPD Quality System relies on and should become part of the overall organizational quality culture.
An essential element of the organizational quality culture is the promotion practices and criteria aligned with the overall quality objectives.
Non-transparent or unfair promotion practices are often an impactful source of bias-generating pressure.
B. Guidance & Expectations
EQIPD does not expect any formal documents or analyses to be conducted. However, it is highly desirable that the Process Owner reviews the promotion practices and criteria and, if necessary, aligns them with the quality objectives:
- Is there a transparent description of Promotion criteria (and, if so, corresponding section of the Dossier may be used to store relevant documents or links to such documents)
- Do the main criteria include adherence to Open Science and Good Research Practive principles?
PLEASE DO NOT FORGET
To discuss promotion criteria with the team members
C. Resources
to be added
back to Toolbox
Next item: 1.3.4 Performance criteria and assessment