Difference between revisions of "1.4.3.5 Expectations from public funders"

From EQIPD
Jump to: navigation, search
(Background and Expectations)
(Background and Expectations)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
* funders willing to communicate their expectations about data management and rigor in study design, conduct, analysis, and reporting
 
* funders willing to communicate their expectations about data management and rigor in study design, conduct, analysis, and reporting
 
* scientists applying for funding and willing to follow best practices in research rigor
 
* scientists applying for funding and willing to follow best practices in research rigor
 +
 +
For funders:
 +
* it is expected that the tool is made freely available (e.g. as a link) on the website informing applicants about the scope of the tool
 +
* the tool provides generic expectations formulated by the EQIPD working group and can be further extended by guidance and other information specific to a funding body
 +
* it is expected that different funding bodies will decide as to whether:
 +
** the use of this tool is mandatory or not
 +
** whether a report generated by the tool should be made part of the application for funding
 +
** whether any additional information or evidence should be provided to support answers collected by the tool
  
 
=Resources=
 
=Resources=

Revision as of 09:43, 16 November 2021

Background and Expectations

EQIPD has developed a tool to support:

  • funders willing to communicate their expectations about data management and rigor in study design, conduct, analysis, and reporting
  • scientists applying for funding and willing to follow best practices in research rigor

For funders:

  • it is expected that the tool is made freely available (e.g. as a link) on the website informing applicants about the scope of the tool
  • the tool provides generic expectations formulated by the EQIPD working group and can be further extended by guidance and other information specific to a funding body
  • it is expected that different funding bodies will decide as to whether:
    • the use of this tool is mandatory or not
    • whether a report generated by the tool should be made part of the application for funding
    • whether any additional information or evidence should be provided to support answers collected by the tool

Resources

to be added



back to Toolbox

Next item: 1.5.1 Quality policy