Difference between revisions of "1.5.5 Sustainability"

From EQIPD
Jump to: navigation, search
(B. Guidance & Expectations)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
It is expected that Process Owner will:
 
It is expected that Process Owner will:
* Calculate cost for maintaining Quality System (personnel and resources)
+
 
 +
*​ Calculate cost for maintaining Quality System (personnel and resources)
 
* Assess the availability of resources (including finances) to support maintenance of the Quality System for the next three years
 
* Assess the availability of resources (including finances) to support maintenance of the Quality System for the next three years
  
Line 23: Line 24:
  
 
​​​​To consider the positive impact of maintaining higher research rigor standards under the Quality System
 
​​​​To consider the positive impact of maintaining higher research rigor standards under the Quality System
 
  
 
== ​C. Resources ==
 
== ​C. Resources ==

Latest revision as of 12:26, 26 October 2021

​​​​​​​​A. Background & Definitions

This item refers to one of the Core Requirements (Core Requirement 18 - "Resources for sustaining the EQIPD Quality System must be available") and is, therefore, considered as essential.

This is likely to be the last core requirement to be implemented (Implementation Strategy​).


B. Guidance & Expectations

During the implementation, Process Owner and her/his team get an idea how much resources will be required to maintain the system.

It is up to a Process Owner how this resource estimation and allocation is done and whether this exercise is documented (by default, no extra paperwork such as a written declaration by a process owner is required).

The key criterion is that lack of time or resources is not used as a justification for not following the most appropriate practices.

It is expected that Process Owner will:

  • ​ Calculate cost for maintaining Quality System (personnel and resources)
  • Assess the availability of resources (including finances) to support maintenance of the Quality System for the next three years


​PLEA​​SE DO NOT FORGET​​

​​​​To consider the positive impact of maintaining higher research rigor standards under the Quality System

​C. Resources

Cost-benefit analysis - to be added



back to Toolbox

Next item: 2.1.1 Study protocol