Difference between revisions of "2.4 Reporting"

From EQIPD
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== ​​​A. Background & Definitions == This Toolbox item refers to one of the Core Requirements (Core Requirement 9 - "Reported data must disclose all repetitions o...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
** failure of a positive or negative control does not justify failing to disclose the repetition
 
** failure of a positive or negative control does not justify failing to disclose the repetition
  
This core requirement applies to both [[2.4.1 Non-public reporting]] and scientific [[2.4.1 Publication]]​s.  
+
This core requirement applies to both [[2.4.1 Non-public reporting]] and scientific [[2.4.2 Publication]]​s.  
  
  
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
It is up to a Process Owner to decide which method is used to make sure that she/he can identify all repetitions of a study, e.g.:
 
It is up to a Process Owner to decide which method is used to make sure that she/he can identify all repetitions of a study, e.g.:
* use a common [[Unique study ID]] for all repetitions
+
* use a common [[2.1.2 Unique study ID]] for all repetitions
* add to a repetition study plan reference(s) to previous studies
+
* add to a repetition study protocol reference(s) to previous studies
 
* maintain a central (for a research unit) list of studies planned and completed
 
* maintain a central (for a research unit) list of studies planned and completed
  
C. Resources
 
 
tba
 
  
 +
== C. Resources ==
 +
to be added
  
  

Latest revision as of 12:47, 24 March 2021

​​​A. Background & Definitions

This Toolbox item refers to one of the Core Requirements (Core Requirement 9 - "Reported data must disclose all repetitions of a study, an experiment, or a test regardless of the outcome​").

There is no formal definition what "repetition" is. One has to acknowledge that there are often methodological differences between two or more consecutive repetitions of a study that may be too significant to be considered as repetitions.

EQIPD offers the following basic guidance on how to define repetitions:

Repetitions are studies, experiments or tests that:

  • ​answer the same research question (even if this involves certain variations in the study conditions, experimental variables and outcomes)
  • are run consecutively
  • are technically valid (i.e. no documented failure of hardware, software, research tool or reagent)
    • failure of positive or negative control may usually not be recognized as a technical failure justifying the exclusion of a repetition from being disclosed
    • failure of a positive or negative control may justify declaring the test results not valid, but
    • failure of a positive or negative control does not justify failing to disclose the repetition

This core requirement applies to both 2.4.1 Non-public reporting and scientific 2.4.2 Publication​s.


B. Guidance & Expectations

In all cases, it is up to scientists to decide whether a study (experiment, test) was repeated or not, and, if yes, decide whether reports should disclose data for all repetitions or simply acknowledge the repetitions.

EQIPD expects that a Process Owner conducts regular spot checks on non-public reports and manuscripts prepared for journal submission to make sure that all repetitions are disclosed.

It is up to a Process Owner to decide which method is used to make sure that she/he can identify all repetitions of a study, e.g.:

  • use a common 2.1.2 Unique study ID for all repetitions
  • add to a repetition study protocol reference(s) to previous studies
  • maintain a central (for a research unit) list of studies planned and completed


C. Resources

to be added



back to Toolbox

Next item: 2.4.1 Non-public reporting