All pages
- 1.1 Mission
- 1.2 Scope
- 1.3.1 Transparency
- 1.3.2 Sources of pressure and bias-producing communication of pressure
- 1.3.3 Promotion criteria within a research unit
- 1.3.4 Performance criteria and assessment
- 1.3.5 Reward system and incentives
- 1.4.1.1 Research integrity
- 1.4.1.2 Data sharing
- 1.4.1 Research ethics
- 1.4.2.1 Biosafety
- 1.4.2.2 Chemical safety
- 1.4.2.3 Radioactivity
- 1.4.2.4 Genetically modified organisms
- 1.4.2.5 Risks to unborn life
- 1.4.2.6 Handling of controlled substances
- 1.4.2.7 Animal care and use
- 1.4.2.8 Human data protection
- 1.4.2 Adherence to legal and regulatory considerations
- 1.4.3.1 Industry-academia: Research as service
- 1.4.3.2 Industry-academia: Research as collaboration
- 1.4.3.2 Quality in collaborative research
- 1.4.3.3 Academia-academia: Research as service
- 1.4.3.4 Academia-academia: Research as collaboration
- 1.4.3.5 Expectations from public funders
- 1.4.3 Quality in collaborative research
- 1.5.1 Quality policy
- 1.5.2.1 Organigram
- 1.5.2.2 Management
- 1.5.2.3 Process owner
- 1.5.2.4 Principal investigators and study directors
- 1.5.2.5 Research team
- 1.5.2.6 Supporting team
- 1.5.2.7 Quality professionals
- 1.5.2 Roles and responsibilities of involved personnel and organization
- 1.5.3.1 Personnel
- 1.5.3.2 Facilities
- 1.5.3.3 Laboratory and experimental equipment used for measurement
- 1.5.3.4 Electronic information system
- 1.5.3.5 Organization-specific know how
- 1.5.3.6 Documentation requirement for sample and material
- 1.5.3.7 Retained personnel records
- 1.5.3 Management of resources
- 1.5.4.1 Independence of internal compliance assessment
- 1.5.4.2 Internal assessment of the organizations' quality professionals
- 1.5.4 Prevention of Conflict of Interest
- 1.5.5 Sustainability
- 2.1.10 Plausibility check
- 2.1.11 Preregistration
- 2.1.1 Study protocol
- 2.1.2 Unique study ID
- 2.1.3 Appraisal of literature and systematic reviews
- 2.1.4 Purpose of research
- 2.1.5 Pre-specification
- 2.1.6 Sample size and power analysis
- 2.1.7 Blinding
- 2.1.8 Randomisation
- 2.1.9 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
- 2.2.1 Use of SOPs for standard experiments
- 2.2.2 Use of template for (manual) data recording
- 2.2.3 Documentation of the experiment and deviations
- 2.3.1.1 Converting non-electronic information into an electronic form
- 2.3.1 Generation, recording, handling and archiving of raw data
- 2.3.2 Primary analysis and evaluation of raw data
- 2.3.3 Statistical analysis
- 2.3.4 Data visualization
- 2.4.1 Non-public reporting
- 2.4.2 Publication
- 2.4 Reporting
- 3.1.1 Platform to record data
- 3.1.2.1 Traceability of data and any person having impact on data
- 3.1.2.1 Traceability of data and any person having impact on data
- 3.1.2.2 Process for witnessing of records
- 3.1.2 Procedures for how and when to record data
- 3.1.3 Data security
- 3.2.1 General guidance on training
- 3.2.2 Good Research Practice training
- 3.2.3 Implementation of the EQIPD Quality System
- 3.2.4 Training on specific methods, tasks and activities
- 3.3.1 Fit-for-purpose working environment
- 3.3.2 Processes to enable computerized and non-computerized systems being suitable for intended use
- 3.3.3 Management of research materials and reagents
- 3.4.1.10 Surgical procedures
- 3.4.1.11 Animal euthanasia procedures
- 3.4.1.1 Ethical evaluation and authorization process of animal use
- 3.4.1.2 Animal procurement & identification
- 3.4.1.3 Animal housing conditions
- 3.4.1.4 Animal environmental conditions
- 3.4.1.5 Food, watering and bedding
- 3.4.1.6 Sanitation procedure
- 3.4.1.7 Frequency and procedure of observation of animals
- 3.4.1.8 Animal health and genetic monitoring
- 3.4.1.9 Veterinary interventions during the study
- 3.4.1 Animal characteristics, care and use
- 3.4.2.1 Cell culturing
- 3.4.2.2 Antibody validation
- 3.4.2.3 Biological and technical replicates
- 3.5.1 Animal and non-animal method and assay qualification
- 3.5.2 Protocols for methods and assays
- 3.5.3 Minimum reporting guidelines
- 3 Support Processes
- 4.1.1 Risk assessment
- 4.1.2 Self assessment
- 4.1.3 External Assessment
- 4.1.3 External assessment
- 4.2.1 Installation of solutions, actions and mitigation strategies
- 4.2.2 Error and incident management
- 4.2.3 Responsible conduct of research
- 4.2.4 Key performance indicators
- 4.3.1.1 Adding new items
- 4.3.1.2 Deleting items
- 4.3.1.3 Revising items
- 4.3.2.1 Using the Planning Tool
- 4.3.2.2 Creating NEEDs
- 4.3.2.3 Revising NEEDs
- 4.3.2.4 Deleting NEEDs
- 4.3.2 Using the EQIPD applications
- 4 Continuous improvement
- ARRIVE 2.0
- ARRIVE Essential - Blinding
- ARRIVE Essential - Experimental animals
- ARRIVE Essential - Experimental procedures
- ARRIVE Essential - Inclusion and exclusion criteria
- ARRIVE Essential - Outcome measures
- ARRIVE Essential - Randomization
- ARRIVE Essential - Results
- ARRIVE Essential - Sample size
- ARRIVE Essential - Statistical methods
- ARRIVE Essential - Study design
- Abbreviations
- Challenges
- Core Requirements
- Documentation in EQIPD
- Dossier
- EQIPD
- EQIPD Quality System
- EQIPD for Core Facilities
- EQIPD principles
- Examples for Errors
- Examples of implementing a unique study ID
- Experimental Record
- FAQ
- Glossary
- Hauptseite
- Information on the calculation of the priority ranking
- Internal assessment
- NEED
- PREPARE
- Performance Standards
- Risk Management Case Studies
- Sex as a biological variable
- Spot checks
- Toolbox
- Why quality matters
- 3.1.2.2 Process for witnessing of records
